New · 16,265 stocks are re-scored daily. The score updates automatically.
Strategy profile

Acquirer's Multiple: EV/EBIT Deep Value (Carlisle): Backtest & Top Stocks 2026

What would an acquirer pay for the operating business? A single multiple decides: the cheaper, the more points. Automated across the entire market.

Save the strategy and StockScorer checks its rules for you every day. You'll get a heads-up whenever a stock crosses the upper or lower score threshold.

✓ Refreshed daily✓ Rule-based: no black box✓ Fully customisable
Total return in the backtestAvg. +6.2 % p.a.
+83.3 %

MSCI World over the same period: +240.1 %

Start: Strategy 100Q2 2016: Strategy 100Q3 2016: Strategy 109Q4 2016: Strategy 122Q1 2017: Strategy 135Q2 2017: Strategy 136Q3 2017: Strategy 137Q4 2017: Strategy 139Q1 2018: Strategy 127Q2 2018: Strategy 119Q3 2018: Strategy 123Q4 2018: Strategy 107Q1 2019: Strategy 124Q2 2019: Strategy 114Q3 2019: Strategy 118Q4 2019: Strategy 122Q1 2020: Strategy 101Q2 2020: Strategy 113Q3 2020: Strategy 119Q4 2020: Strategy 116Q1 2021: Strategy 131Q2 2021: Strategy 128Q3 2021: Strategy 128Q4 2021: Strategy 136Q1 2022: Strategy 151Q2 2022: Strategy 143Q3 2022: Strategy 137Q4 2022: Strategy 134Q1 2023: Strategy 140Q2 2023: Strategy 143Q3 2023: Strategy 145Q4 2023: Strategy 145Q1 2024: Strategy 149Q2 2024: Strategy 146Q3 2024: Strategy 156Q4 2024: Strategy 171Q1 2025: Strategy 164Q2 2025: Strategy 165Q3 2025: Strategy 167Q4 2025: Strategy 172Q1 2026: Strategy 209Q2 2026: Strategy 18381150220290359StartQ1 2021Q1 2026Q2 2026StrategyBenchmark (MSCI World)

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

+6.2 %Return p.a. (backtest)
-6.8 %vs. MSCI World p.a.
16,265Stocks analysed
SmallMidLargeCap classes
How the profile stands today

What the profile looks like today

As of 09/30/2026
501High
802Medium
14,962Low
Classification in the universe
High 3 %Medium 5 %Low 92 %
Distribution of scores in the market
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
Score distribution as a data table
ScoreNumber of stocks
-213,375
-10
0892
+11,074
+20
+3924
Countries of the high-match stocks
CN 25%JP 15%US 15%SG 10%AU 5%Other 30%
How rules turn into a score

How the scoring works

Every stock runs through the same disclosed rules. The points add up to a score, traceable down to the individual rule.

01
Rules

Each rule checks a metric against a threshold, for example ROE above 15 %.

02
Points & weighting

You decide how much each rule counts: from +1 to +3 or −1 to −3.

03
Score & classification

The sum is the score. That gives three classes: high, medium, low match.

Low match
< 1 points
Medium match
1 – 2 points
High match
≥ 3 points

These terms describe only the match with the criteria, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

What the strategy measures a stock against

What is behind this strategy?

01
How cheap is the operating business?

EV/EBIT prices the operating result (net debt included), the way an acquirer calculates.

02
Is the stock among the cheapest in the market?

The cheapest valuation decile earns full points; the most expensive market half costs points.

03
Why no further filters?

Carlisle's thesis: every added quality factor lowers returns. So deliberately only price counts.

04
Does that include financials?

No. Financials and real-estate companies are excluded because enterprise value is not defined for them. This is a documented deviation from the original.

Excerpt from the rule profile

These exact rules run over every stock daily.

4 of 4 rules
No financials or real estate (EV not defined)+0 ptsExclusion
EV / EBITisless than5+3 pts
Group:AND
+1 pts
EV / EBITisat least5
EV / EBITisless than8
All of these conditions must be met
Group:OR
−2 pts
EV / EBITisat least10
EV / EBITis missing
At least one of these conditions must be met
What the backtest shows, and what it does not

How has the profile performed?

Strategy: +83.3%Benchmark (MSCI World): +240.1%
Start: Strategy 100Q2 2016: Strategy 100Q3 2016: Strategy 109Q4 2016: Strategy 122Q1 2017: Strategy 135Q2 2017: Strategy 136Q3 2017: Strategy 137Q4 2017: Strategy 139Q1 2018: Strategy 127Q2 2018: Strategy 119Q3 2018: Strategy 123Q4 2018: Strategy 107Q1 2019: Strategy 124Q2 2019: Strategy 114Q3 2019: Strategy 118Q4 2019: Strategy 122Q1 2020: Strategy 101Q2 2020: Strategy 113Q3 2020: Strategy 119Q4 2020: Strategy 116Q1 2021: Strategy 131Q2 2021: Strategy 128Q3 2021: Strategy 128Q4 2021: Strategy 136Q1 2022: Strategy 151Q2 2022: Strategy 143Q3 2022: Strategy 137Q4 2022: Strategy 134Q1 2023: Strategy 140Q2 2023: Strategy 143Q3 2023: Strategy 145Q4 2023: Strategy 145Q1 2024: Strategy 149Q2 2024: Strategy 146Q3 2024: Strategy 156Q4 2024: Strategy 171Q1 2025: Strategy 164Q2 2025: Strategy 165Q3 2025: Strategy 167Q4 2025: Strategy 172Q1 2026: Strategy 209Q2 2026: Strategy 18381150220290359StartQ2 2017Q3 2018Q4 2019Q1 2021Q2 2022Q3 2023Q4 2024Q1 2026Q2 2026StrategyBenchmark (MSCI World)

The backtest shows a total return of +83.3%. The MSCI World reaches +240.1% over the same period.

+6.2%Return p.a.
+13.0%Benchmark p.a.
-27.6%Largest decline
+0.39Sharpe Ratio

Survivorship-free since June 30, 2015: the index composition is applied point-in-time.

Historical period, quarterly rebalancing, no taxes or fees. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

The way of working this profile suits

Who is this strategy for?

For committed value investors who want maximum simplicity: no quality factors, no momentum, just the price. The strategy deliberately leans into the unloved. That takes patience and the willingness to invest against prevailing sentiment.

Adopt, customise & track this strategy
What people usually ask before starting

Frequently asked questions

Is this the Acquirer's Multiple by Tobias Carlisle?
The strategy follows the principle Carlisle described: only the acquirer's-view valuation counts, with no quality or cash-flow add-on filter, as in the original. StockScorer uses absolute point tiers instead of a universe ranking and has no affiliation with the trademark owner.
Why no quality factor like in the Two-Factor strategy?
The approach assumes that high returns on capital revert to the mean over time. Paying up for quality often means paying for a past that will not repeat. Carlisle explicitly rejects any added factor, which is why only the price counts here.
Is this a recommendation to act?
No. StockScorer provides automated, rule-based assessments for information only. Nothing here replaces individual financial advice or constitutes a solicitation to buy or sell securities.
Can I adjust the valuation tiers?
Yes. After free registration you can copy the profile and modify it freely in the rule editor: tier boundaries, point values and the margin of safety are configurable.

Method & Criteria

EV/EBIT Deep Value is the radically simplified alternative to multi-layer value systems. The idea became known as the "Acquirer's Multiple" through Tobias Carlisle: high returns on capital attract competition and rarely last (mean reversion), and Carlisle's thesis holds that every added quality factor lowers returns. So only one thing counts here, with no add-on filter for cash flow, balance sheet or quality: enterprise value relative to operating earnings, i.e. EV/EBIT including all debt. Unlike the original, financials and real-estate companies are excluded: for banks, insurers and REITs enterprise value is not defined, so the multiple often turns negative and would wrongly count as cheap. Utilities are included.

How does EV/EBIT Deep Value work?

The core, and the ONLY criterion in the strategy, is a single multiple: enterprise value (market capitalisation plus net debt) divided by operating earnings. An EV/EBIT up to 5 (historically the cheapest tenth of the market) earns +3 points, 5 to 8 still +1. From an EV/EBIT of 10, the score is −2 points. If the multiple is missing because EBIT is negative, that deliberately counts to the worst tier as well.

The upper threshold is a uniform 3 points across all size classes: Carlisle does split into larger and smaller universes, but applies the same rules to both, and historically smaller names even outperformed. Earlier FCF and leverage add-on rules have been removed as part of the fidelity round: Carlisle's core thesis is a single-factor model with no quality filter.

The criteria at a glance

EV/EBIT 0–5: cheapest valuation decile (+3). EV/EBIT 5–8: very cheap (+1). EV/EBIT 8–10: neutral zone. From 10 or missing: expensive or unprofitable (−2).

Exclusion: financials and real-estate companies are ruled out by a knockout (enterprise value is not defined for them).

No further criterion: deliberately no quality, cash-flow or balance-sheet filter, as in the original.

Why EV/EBIT instead of P/E? The P/E ratio ignores capital structure: a highly leveraged company looks optically cheap. Enterprise value prices the debt in: the perspective of someone taking over the whole business.

Strengths, limits and deviations from the original

The original ranks the entire universe by EV/EBIT and selects the cheapest percentiles. StockScorer translates the ranks into absolute tiers (decile and quartile proxies from historical market data). A stock's score depends only on its own numbers and stays fully traceable. In extreme market phases the absolute ladder can produce more or fewer hits than a true ranking.

Fidelity update as of 23 August 2026: the earlier free-cash-flow and leverage add-on rules have been removed, because Carlisle explicitly rejects any quality filter, it would be an added factor diluting the excess return of the pure price signal. Cap thresholds are unified because Carlisle tests small- and large-cap universes with the same rules. One documented deviation remains: StockScorer uses EBIT, while Carlisle's current definition derives an adjusted top-down operating earnings figure from the income statement.

The strength is also the weakness: without a quality filter, structurally sick companies land in the cheapest decile too. The strategy bets that the price discount overcompensates for that risk. If you want both, combine it with the 9-Point Balance-Sheet Check as a second filter.

Who is this strategy for?

For experienced value investors with a contrarian streak who prefer one maximally simple, disciplined rule over a complex factor blend.