New · 16,265 stocks are re-scored daily. The score updates automatically.
Strategy profile

Trending Value (Value + Momentum): Current Backtest & Top Stocks 2026

Two uncorrelated factors in one score: a valuation composite finds the cheap stocks, momentum shows when the market starts to discover them.

Save the strategy and StockScorer checks its rules for you every day. You'll get a heads-up whenever a stock crosses the upper or lower score threshold.

✓ Refreshed daily✓ Rule-based: no black box✓ Fully customisable
Total return in the backtestAvg. +14.4 % p.a.
+284.8 %

MSCI World over the same period: +240.1 %

Start: Strategy 100Q2 2016: Strategy 100Q3 2016: Strategy 105Q4 2016: Strategy 122Q1 2017: Strategy 134Q2 2017: Strategy 135Q3 2017: Strategy 141Q4 2017: Strategy 150Q1 2018: Strategy 152Q2 2018: Strategy 150Q3 2018: Strategy 158Q4 2018: Strategy 132Q1 2019: Strategy 148Q2 2019: Strategy 148Q3 2019: Strategy 151Q4 2019: Strategy 158Q1 2020: Strategy 109Q2 2020: Strategy 119Q3 2020: Strategy 110Q4 2020: Strategy 137Q1 2021: Strategy 165Q2 2021: Strategy 168Q3 2021: Strategy 168Q4 2021: Strategy 175Q1 2022: Strategy 190Q2 2022: Strategy 182Q3 2022: Strategy 179Q4 2022: Strategy 192Q1 2023: Strategy 186Q2 2023: Strategy 198Q3 2023: Strategy 217Q4 2023: Strategy 214Q1 2024: Strategy 245Q2 2024: Strategy 255Q3 2024: Strategy 273Q4 2024: Strategy 289Q1 2025: Strategy 286Q2 2025: Strategy 286Q3 2025: Strategy 315Q4 2025: Strategy 344Q1 2026: Strategy 360Q2 2026: Strategy 38577160242325408StartQ1 2021Q1 2026Q2 2026StrategyBenchmark (MSCI World)

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

+14.4 %Return p.a. (backtest)
+1.4 %vs. MSCI World p.a.
16,265Stocks analysed
SmallMidLargeCap classes
How the profile stands today

What the profile looks like today

As of 09/30/2026
1,626High
6,640Medium
7,999Low
Classification in the universe
High 10 %Medium 41 %Low 49 %
Distribution of scores in the market
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7
Score distribution as a data table
ScoreNumber of stocks
-4411
-3537
-21,184
-11,052
01,808
+13,007
+22,816
+32,228
+41,596
+51,087
+6452
+787
Countries of the high-match stocks
JP 40%US 15%GB 15%BM 10%BE 5%Other 15%
How rules turn into a score

How the scoring works

Every stock runs through the same disclosed rules. The points add up to a score, traceable down to the individual rule.

01
Rules

Each rule checks a metric against a threshold, for example ROE above 15 %.

02
Points & weighting

You decide how much each rule counts: from +1 to +3 or −1 to −3.

03
Score & classification

The sum is the score. That gives three classes: high, medium, low match.

Low match
< 2 points
Medium match
2 – 4 points
High match
≥ 5 points

These terms describe only the match with the criteria, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

What the strategy measures a stock against

What is behind this strategy?

Profile of a stock with a high match
50%100%High match · Profitability: 100%High match · Valuation: 83%High match · Momentum: 50%Market average · Profitability: 38%Market average · Valuation: 28%Market average · Momentum: 34%ProfitabilityValuationMomentumHigh matchMarket average
High matchMarket average
01
Is the stock cheap across the board?

Six metrics (P/E, P/B, EV/Sales, FCF yield, EV/EBITDA, payout) earn one point each.

02
Is the market starting to change its mind?

The absolute 6-month price move delivers a small add-on as a timing signal, without overriding the value filter.

03
Is a value trap looming?

An intact downtrend below −10% over six months costs a point: cheap and still falling is the classic trap.

04
Is expensive really expensive?

Being expensive on P/E, P/B and EV/EBITDA at the same time earns a hard deduction.

Excerpt from the rule profile

These exact rules run over every stock daily.

4 of 9 rules
Group:AND
+1 pts
Price-to-Earnings Ratioisgreater than0
Price-to-Earnings Ratioisless than12
All of these conditions must be met
Group:AND
+1 pts
Price-to-Book Ratioisgreater than0
Price-to-Book Ratioisless than1.5
All of these conditions must be met
EV / Salesisless than1.2+1 pts
Free cash flow yieldisgreater than6.7+1 pts
+ 5 more rules in the profile

After a free sign-up: the full profile in the rule editor to copy, adjust thresholds and save as your own starting profile.

See & copy all rules
What the backtest shows, and what it does not

How has the profile performed?

Strategy: +284.8%Benchmark (MSCI World): +240.1%
Start: Strategy 100Q2 2016: Strategy 100Q3 2016: Strategy 105Q4 2016: Strategy 122Q1 2017: Strategy 134Q2 2017: Strategy 135Q3 2017: Strategy 141Q4 2017: Strategy 150Q1 2018: Strategy 152Q2 2018: Strategy 150Q3 2018: Strategy 158Q4 2018: Strategy 132Q1 2019: Strategy 148Q2 2019: Strategy 148Q3 2019: Strategy 151Q4 2019: Strategy 158Q1 2020: Strategy 109Q2 2020: Strategy 119Q3 2020: Strategy 110Q4 2020: Strategy 137Q1 2021: Strategy 165Q2 2021: Strategy 168Q3 2021: Strategy 168Q4 2021: Strategy 175Q1 2022: Strategy 190Q2 2022: Strategy 182Q3 2022: Strategy 179Q4 2022: Strategy 192Q1 2023: Strategy 186Q2 2023: Strategy 198Q3 2023: Strategy 217Q4 2023: Strategy 214Q1 2024: Strategy 245Q2 2024: Strategy 255Q3 2024: Strategy 273Q4 2024: Strategy 289Q1 2025: Strategy 286Q2 2025: Strategy 286Q3 2025: Strategy 315Q4 2025: Strategy 344Q1 2026: Strategy 360Q2 2026: Strategy 38577160242325408StartQ2 2017Q3 2018Q4 2019Q1 2021Q2 2022Q3 2023Q4 2024Q1 2026Q2 2026StrategyBenchmark (MSCI World)

The backtest shows a total return of +284.8%. The MSCI World reaches +240.1% over the same period.

+14.4%Return p.a.
+13.0%Benchmark p.a.
-31.0%Largest decline
+0.78Sharpe Ratio

Survivorship-free since June 30, 2015: the index composition is applied point-in-time.

Historical period, quarterly rebalancing, no taxes or fees. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

The way of working this profile suits

Who is this strategy for?

For systematic investors who want to harvest value premia without waiting years for the re-rating. The momentum trigger means more portfolio turnover than pure value strategies; if you rarely want to look at your portfolio, the classic valuation strategies are a better fit.

Adopt, customise & track this strategy
What people usually ask before starting

Frequently asked questions

Is this based on O'Shaughnessy's Trending Value?
The strategy follows the principle described in "What Works on Wall Street": value composite as the filter, absolute 6-month momentum as the ranking. StockScorer uses absolute point tiers instead of percentile rankings and deliberately weights momentum lightly (±1) so it cannot replace the value filter.
Why is a single cheap metric not enough?
Because every single metric has systematic blind spots: P/E overlooks debt, P/B fails on intangibles, sales say nothing about margin. Only the breadth of the composite makes "cheap" robust.
Is this a recommendation to act?
No. StockScorer provides automated, rule-based assessments for information only. Nothing here replaces individual financial advice or constitutes a solicitation to buy or sell securities.
Can I change the momentum weight?
Yes. After free registration you can copy the profile and adjust it in the rule editor: momentum tiers, value thresholds and point values are fully configurable.

Method & Criteria

Single valuation metrics mislead: a low P/E can be a cyclical earnings peak, a low P/B a write-down candidate. James O'Shaughnessy showed empirically that a composite of several metrics ("Value Composite") is more reliable than any single figure, and that coupling it to a stubborn price momentum defuses the classic value trap: it is not the cheapest that gets selected, but the cheap stock the market has just begun to correct. In the original, value is the filter (only the cheapest decile is considered) and momentum ranks within it. StockScorer implements the value composite with six valuation points; the absolute 6-month price move, as in the original, has since the fidelity round acted only as a small ±1 add-on and tiebreaker, so momentum cannot override the value filter.

How does Value + Momentum work?

The value composite awards one point each for: P/E below 12, P/B below 1.5, EV/Sales below 1.2, FCF yield above 6.7% (equivalent to a price below 15 times free cash flow), EV/EBITDA below 8 and a shareholder yield (dividends plus net buybacks) above 2.5%. Being expensive or without a value on P/E, P/B and EV/EBITDA simultaneously earns −3: the most expensive corner of the market.

Momentum now provides only the timing, not the selection: an absolute 6-month price move above +10% earns +1 point, an intact downtrend below −10% costs 1 point. The upper threshold is a uniform 5 points across all size classes: at least four value hits plus positive momentum, or all six value hits alone.

The criteria at a glance

Value composite (each +1): P/E 0–12, P/B 0–1.5, EV/Sales 0–1.2, FCF yield > 6.7%, EV/EBITDA 0–8, shareholder yield > 2.5%.

Broad expensive deduction (−3): P/E above 25, P/B above 3 and EV/EBITDA above 15 at the same time; missing values count to the expensive side.

Momentum (absolute 6-month price move, as in the original): above +10% (+1), below −10% (−1). Also acts as the tiebreaker on equal scores.

Strengths, limits and deviations from the original

The original ("Trending Value") ranks the universe in two percentile stages: first the value composite of six metrics as a filter onto the cheapest decile, then momentum ranks WITHIN that decile. StockScorer translates the value rank into absolute thresholds: one binary cheapness point per metric. Three metrics are replaced by close relatives: EV/Sales instead of price/sales, FCF yield instead of price/FCF.

Fidelity update as of 23 August 2026: momentum is now deliberately weighted lightly (only ±1 instead of its own +5/+3/−2 ladder) and uses the absolute 6-month price move, as in the original, instead of relative strength versus the market, so it cannot override the value filter, mirroring the original where value filters first and momentum only ranks afterward. Shareholder yield (dividends plus net buybacks) replaces the previously used pure dividend yield, bringing it closer to O'Shaughnessy's own criterion.

The high share of binary individual criteria keeps the result transparently traceable, though in extreme market phases it can produce more or fewer hits than a true percentile ranking across the whole universe.

Who is this strategy for?

For rule-based investors who want to combine the value factor with a trend filter and are prepared to follow the system through more frequent signal changes.