Stock · MSFT · Technology

Microsoft Corporation

United States · Large Cap · listed since 1986 · Revenue 12 mo. $331.8B

Price as of 11/06/2026

StockScorer score
7.3
of 10 8 of 11 points High Match To the score
Price
$530.61
1 Y −2.9%
Market cap
$4.1T
Phase
Growth
revenue growing, core business profitable
Revenue +16.1% a year (3 years)EBIT margin 46.8%Payout 27.4% of operating cash flow

Summary

Microsoft Corporation is above the middle of the Technology sector overall

63.1 of 100

Mean of the six area values. Each area value is the mean of the stock's ranks among the companies in its sector. 50 is the middle of the sector, not a share of companies beaten.

Analysis

What the price requires

Capital spending of €104.1B is pushing down FCF: the price requires 23.6% FCF growth a year, 13.1% at a normal investment rate.

If free cash flow stays at €60.1B (2026), it supports €667.9B. The remaining €3T of the market value assume it grows 23.6% a year for 10 years and not at all afterwards.

Required FCF growth per year

23.6%

no growth afterwards

Market value breakdown€3.6T market value, price as of 11/06/2026

€667.9B without growth
€3T priced-in growth
  • 5 yrs achieved 5.6%
  • 10 yrs achieved 11.6%
  • priced in 23.6%

Valuation against its own history

Price to operating cash flow 21.6×, within its usual range.

Middle half of 20 quarters: 21.6× to 27.3×, median 25.9×.

Measures only against its own past, not against what the company is worth. Price as of 11/06/2026.

2 signs support the expectation, 1 speaks against it.

What supports it

with respect to the priced-in expectation

  • High, stable gross margin median 68.2%, range 5.2 pp (10 years)
  • High return on capital every year ROCE at least 16.4% (10 years)

What speaks against it

with respect to the priced-in expectation

  • Expectation above the company's own record at a normal investment rate priced in 13.1%, own record at most 11.6%

AI summary of the 2026 annual report

The business of Microsoft Corporation according to its report

A language model selected and condensed statements from the report. Each statement carries a verbatim quote. The selection is not complete and shows the state of the report. It gives no rating and does not feed into the score.

Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 06/30/2026, filed 07/29/2026. Open the report at the SEC

Revenue by segment, fiscal year ended 06/30/2026

SegmentShareRevenue
Productivity and Business Processes
42.2%
$140B
Intelligent Cloud
41.5%
$137.8B
More Personal Computing
16.3%
$54.1B

From the report's structured data (XBRL), not from the language model. The sum can differ slightly from group revenue.

Business model according to the report

  • Customers can use Azure through Microsoft's global datacenter network for computing, networking, storage, app services, AI and Internet of Things.

    Quote
    Customers can use Azure through our global network of datacenters for computing, networking, storage, mobile and web application services, AI, and Internet of Things.
  • Microsoft 365 Commercial revenue is mainly affected by growth in the installed user base and in revenue per user, and by customers moving from Office on-premises licenses to Microsoft 365.

    Quote
    Microsoft 365 Commercial revenue is mainly affected by a combination of continued installed base growth and average revenue per user expansion, as well as the continued shift from Office licensed on-premises to Microsoft 365.
  • LinkedIn offers paid solutions called Talent Solutions, Marketing Solutions, Premium Subscriptions and Sales Solutions.

    Quote
    LinkedIn offers monetized solutions designed to offer AI-enabled insights and productivity: Talent Solutions, Marketing Solutions, Premium Subscriptions, and Sales Solutions.
  • Windows OEM revenue depends significantly on how many Windows licenses device makers (OEMs) buy and preinstall on the devices they sell.

    Quote
    Windows OEM revenue is impacted significantly by the number of Windows operating system licenses purchased by OEMs, which they pre-install on the devices they sell.

Customers according to the report

  • Direct sales serve customers from large multinational companies and public sector organizations to small and medium-sized businesses.

    Quote
    Direct sales activities serve customers ranging from large multinational enterprises and public sector organizations to small and medium-sized businesses.
  • LinkedIn revenue is mainly affected by demand from companies and professionals for subscriptions to Talent Solutions, Sales Solutions and Premium Subscriptions.

    Quote
    LinkedIn revenue is mainly affected by demand from enterprises and professionals for subscriptions to Talent Solutions, Sales Solutions, and Premium Subscriptions offerings

Competition according to the report

  • Competitors of Office include software and global application vendors, web and mobile app companies, AI-first app companies and local app developers.

    Quote
    Competitors to Office include software and global application vendors, web-based and mobile application companies, AI-first application companies, as well as local application developers.
  • Azure faces varied competition from cloud service providers and open-source offerings.

    Quote
    Azure faces diverse competition from cloud service providers and open-source offerings.
  • Microsoft's AI offerings compete with AI products from hyperscalers, other emerging competitors and open-source offerings, many of which are also current or potential partners.

    Quote
    Our AI offerings compete with AI products from hyperscalers, as well as products from other emerging competitors and other open-source offerings, many of which are also current or potential partners.

Risks according to the report

  • Microsoft has made and keeps making large capital and operating investments in AI models and cloud services, including datacenters, components and energy.

    Quote
    We have made and are continuing to make significant capital and operational investments to develop, train, deploy, and support AI models and related cloud-based services, including building and expanding datacenters, acquiring necessary components, and securing energy resources.
  • If adoption of Microsoft's AI services is slower than expected, or customers do not keep using Azure for AI workloads at expected levels, Microsoft may not realize the expected returns on its investments.

    Quote
    If adoption of our AI services develops more slowly than expected, or if customers do not continue to utilize Azure for AI workloads at anticipated levels, we may not realize the expected returns on our investments.
  • For certain critical device and datacenter components there are few suppliers, and these parts are in short supply.

    Quote
    There are limited suppliers for certain critical device and datacenter components, and those items are in short supply.
  • Availability, reliability and cost of electrical power are critical for running and expanding Microsoft's datacenters.

    Quote
    The availability, reliability, and cost of electrical power are critical to the operation and expansion of our datacenters.
  • Some agreements may let a government end the contract without cause and set higher liability limits for certain losses.

    Quote
    Some agreements may allow a government to terminate without cause and provide for higher liability limits for certain losses.

Since the last quarter

Q1 → Q2 2026

Mostly worse than the previous quarter: 3 of 3 changes for the worse.

  • FCF, 12 mo.$72.9B → $67.0B−8.1%worse
  • FCF margin22.9% → 20.2%−2.7 ppworse
  • Net debt$93.3B → $107.9B+15.6%worse

5 more unchanged: Revenue, 12 mo., Gross margin, EBIT margin, Shares outstanding, Return on equity

Derivation

How the sector comparison is derived

Each area value is the average of its metrics' ranks within the sector (0 to 100, 50 is the middle). For metrics where lower is better, the rank is mirrored. The overall value is the average of the area values.

Price as of 11/06/2026.

Profitability73.1above the middleEarns more than the sector: EBIT margin 46.78%, sector 17.40%.
MetricStockSector medianPosition in sector
Return on equity30.23%14.60%Rank 79
Return on capital (Greenblatt)41.27%29.77%Rank 58
EBIT margin46.78%17.40%Rank 97
FCF margin20.19%18.54%Rank 59
Gross margin67.94%48.47%Rank 73
Growth74.9above the middleGrows faster than the sector: Sustainable growth (ROE × retained earnings) 34.94%, sector 2.87%.
MetricStockSector medianPosition in sector
Revenue growth, 1 year17.79%12.70%Rank 66
Earnings growth, 3 years per year22.83%9.54%Rank 78
Earnings growth, 5 years per year17.38%14.07%Rank 59
Sustainable growth (ROE × retained earnings)34.94%2.87%Rank 97
Valuation40.0around the middleValued about like the sector.
MetricStockSector medianPosition in sector
Earnings yield3.38%2.64%Rank 62
FCF yield1.65%3.06%Rank 29
EV/saleslower is better12.385.18Rank 19
EV/EBITlower is better26.4626.24Rank 50
Momentum74.3above the middleShare price doing better than the sector: Distance from 52-week high −4.53%, sector −33.23%.
MetricStockSector medianPosition in sector
Share price, 1 year−2.87%−0.59%Rank 45
Share price, 6 months28.30%−4.46%Rank 83
Share price, 3 months11.26%−5.84%Rank 78
Distance from 52-week high−4.53%−33.23%Rank 91
Quality55.1around the middleQuality about like the sector.
MetricStockSector medianPosition in sector
Accruals (Sloan)lower is better13.11%1.65%Rank 16
Change in share countlower is better−0.16%−0.17%Rank 50
Dividend streak in years208Rank 94
Price reaction to results, market-adjusted−0.12%−1.57%Rank 61
Balance sheet & risk61.4above the middleLess risk than the sector: Volatility, 1 year 32.90%, sector 50.37%.
MetricStockSector medianPosition in sector
Equity ratio58.33%53.98%Rank 61
Net debt/EBITDAlower is better0.25−0.20Rank 40
Debt to equitylower is better0.290.33Rank 54
Volatility, 1 yearlower is better32.90%50.37%Rank 91

Ten years in figures

Revenue from $96.6B (2017) to $331.8B (2026), 14.7% a year.

Fiscal years, amounts in USD
YearRevenue, $BEBIT marginFCF, $BSharesNet debt, $B
201796.630.1%31.47.83B78.5
2018110.431.8%32.37.79B69.9
2019125.834.1%38.37.75B67.0
2020143.037.0%45.27.68B57.4
2021168.141.6%56.17.61B53.6
2022198.342.1%65.17.54B47.3
2023211.941.8%59.57.47B25.3
2024245.144.6%74.17.47B48.8
2025281.745.6%71.67.47B30.3
2026331.846.8%67.07.45B107.9
7.3 / 10High MatchStockScorer score8 of 11 points

5 of 7 StockScorer Score rules met · How the score is built

Microsoft Corporation mainly meets criteria in the Profitability category. Result from 18 strategies checked.

This stock · Profitability: 100%This stock · Growth: 100%This stock · Valuation: 0%This stock · Momentum: 0%Median of all stocks · Profitability: 33%Median of all stocks · Growth: 0%Median of all stocks · Valuation: 0%Median of all stocks · Momentum: 0%50%100%ProfitabilityGrowthValuationMomentumThis stockMedian of all stocks

How Microsoft Corporation's score is built

Microsoft Corporation is rated here with the StockScorer Score strategy, the flagship rule set. It compares return and cash-flow metrics with the median of the company's own sector and checks growth and price trend.

5 of 7 rules met

8 of 11 points

  1. Free cash flow yield above the sector mediannot met0 of 2 points
  2. Return on capital (Greenblatt ROC) above the sector medianmet2 of 2 points
  3. Return on equity above the sector medianmet1 of 1 point
  4. Free cash flow margin above the sector medianmet2 of 2 points
  5. Revenue growth above 15%met2 of 2 points
  6. 3-year earnings growth above 12% p.a.met1 of 1 point
  7. 12-month share price more than 20 percentage points ahead of the marketnot met0 of 1 point
  8. Exclusion: financial and real estate stocksdoes not apply

Detail data

How does Microsoft Corporation stock perform across 18 strategies?

Excerpt from 18 strategies checked. The full evaluation is visible after a free sign-up.

12 more strategies locked

With a free account, you can see the match across all strategies checked in one complete overview.

  • Growth Momentum (CAN SLIM principle)
  • Defensive: Low Volatility
  • Altman Z-Score: Stress Test
  • Earnings Quality: Accrual Check (Sloan)
  • Magic Formula: Value + Quality
  • Undervalued Stocks: Multi-Factor Check
  • Levermann Strategy (13 Criteria)
  • Dividend Aristocrats & Continuity
  • High-Growth / Rule of 40
  • Acquirer's Multiple: EV/EBIT Deep Value
  • PEG Strategy (inspired by Peter Lynch)
  • Trending Value: Value + Momentum

Microsoft Corporation key metrics: P/E, P/B and equity ratio

Selected fundamental metrics for Microsoft Corporation.

MetricStockSector
P/E ratio29.635.1
P/B ratio8.95.5
Return on equity (ROE)30.2%14.6%
Equity ratio58.3%54.0%
Debt-to-equity (D/E)0.290.33
Dividend yield0.7%0.9%

Similar stocks in Technology

How comparable stocks in the same sector score in the StockScorer model.

SymbolCompanyRating
MSFTMicrosoft Corporationthis page
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.Low4.5
ORCLOracle CorporationLow3.6
PANWPalo Alto Networks IncHigh6.4
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inclocked
FTNTFortinet Inclocked

Frequently asked questions about Microsoft Corporation stock

How does Microsoft Corporation stock (MSFT) score in the StockScorer model?
Microsoft Corporation stock reaches a StockScorer score of 7.3 out of 10, which is a high match with the rule-based strategies. 5 out of 7 flagship profile rules are met.
What is Microsoft Corporation's P/E ratio?
Microsoft Corporation's P/E ratio is 29.6. The Technology sector median is 35.1.
What sector is Microsoft Corporation in?
Microsoft Corporation is assigned to the Technology sector. Its rank within the sector is 63.1 out of 100: 100 means the stock leads its peer group of large and mid-cap sector stocks in every measured area.

Unlock the full analysis for free

Signed up in 30 seconds, free.

  • More metrics: FCF margin, cash flow yield and more
  • Full peer comparison within the same sector
  • See the match across all strategies in detail
  • Apply your own scoring profile to any stock
  • Add the stock to your watchlist and track score changes
  • Daily updated ratings, rule-based and transparent

Learn more about the metrics in the metrics glossary or all rated stocks in the stock overview.

How StockScorer rates every stock is explained on the methodology page.